No Crown for California Chrome
Last
night at precisely midnight, I was awake, hoping to witness the first US Triple
Crown victor since Affrimed in 1978. For California’s bronze hero, it
wasn’t to be. Art Sherman’s colt was another to join the same ranks as Smarty
Jones, Big Brown and Sunday Silence, among others, having failed at the
final hurdle- the ultimate test, the Belmont Stakes. The memories of Secretariat’s
fairy-tale, War Admiral’s dominance and Affirmed’s scintillating
battles with Alydar, have painted the history of the Triple Crown.
For racing fans all over the world, California Chrome was hope
that the thoroughbred racehorse was once again vastly superior to its rivals,
beholding all of the qualities required to reach the ultimate vein of
superstardom.
Having
never before witnessed a potential Triple Crown winner negotiate Belmont Park’s
demanding 1 ½ miles at the time it occurred, I was in awe to discover the
support behind what was, and often is, a remarkable story. It appears although
California Chrome’s bid for the Triple Crown is now void; the stories continue
to circulate in the dramatic aftermath of his brave effort. He officially dead
heated with Wicked Strong for 4th position. I’m sure I was not the
only surprised spectator to hear one of his owners, Steven Coburn, and his
reaction to the race. Unaware of California Chrome’s injury (a bloody gash to
his front right foot), Coburn criticised the nature and method in which
entries are determined for the Belmont Stakes. He displayed his opinion on how
it is unfair for horses that have run in both previous legs, the Kentucky Derby
and the Preakness Stakes.
"If you've got a horse, run him in all
three...This is the coward's way out." and "If you can't make enough
points to get in the [Derby], you can't run in the [Preakness and Belmont]."
were his comments following the race. Obviously due to the high pressure
scenario and such a build up, it is understandable he may have been
disappointed or angry, and thus used those emotions to display his hurt. Having
reportedly shouted at his wife after the interview, it appears to me Coburn
threw his toys out of his pram. I personally do not think this is fair or
indeed an admirable representation of his horse, or his appreciation for him
and what he has achieved. For California Chrome is not aware, nor should be
responsible for such an outburst. I am saddened as it subtracted from what was
a brave performance by a tough horse.
Whilst fully
understanding Coburn’s feelings on the final test in the Triple Crown, I oppose
him in that he understood the nature of the sequence before declaring to run
his horse. Therefore he surely cannot complain having made the decision to run
him. The nation and beyond was hugely excited by the spectacle provided and
could have proved a contributing factor to said decision, yet in reality the
choice was made by him and his partners alone. Tonalist (Joel
Rosario/Christophe Clement) won the Belmont Stakes having won the Peter Pan
Stakes prior, beating re-opposing bridesmaid Commissioner (Javier Castellano/Todd Pletcher) by a head. 3rd
place belonged to Medal Count, who was the only horse to have raced in one of
the previous two legs, having finished 7 ½ lengths adrift of California Chrome
in the Kentucky Derby. He did not contest the Preakness Stakes. You can see
Coburn’s frustration as if a horse could only race in the Belmont, given its
participation in both the other legs, California Chrome would now be another
winner of the Triple Crown. I would like to add I believe his jockey, Victor
Espinoza, gave him in my opinion an intelligent ride, and was one man to take
out of the incident. I feel he acted with great dignity and pride in his horse, considering he was under perhaps the most pressure of all.
However, Coburn's wishes would
undoubtedly mean the Triple Crown would be easier to claim- is this really what
racing fans want? I believe the mental and physical constitution of a horse
needed to win the trio of races is part of what makes the Triple Crown so
valuable and special, in both financial and sentimental aspects. Previous
winners of the Kentucky Derby, Preakness and Belmont have all had the same
challenges as California Chrome. Whether it has been due to luck, ability or
any injuries sustained during the race, Chrome was not to join them on the
illustrious roll of honour. Whether his injury bared any relevance to his
finishing position remains to be seen, yet connections do not believe it to be
a very serious one.
The purpose of this piece was to outline my own
views on the events that unfolded. I think it would be remarkable if here in
the UK such showbiz, glamour and fame was incorporated into our sport as it was
for those precious moments before the 2014 Belmont. Our sport desperately needs
champions to immerse itself in the forefront of the wider public’s imagination.
Perhaps people need to look no further than Coronation Cup winner Cirrus Des
Aigles, who ironically won Epsom’s 1 ½ mile test injured himself, on Saturday.
Corine Barande-Barbe, his trainer, is an inspiring, elegant , engaging and
endearing character who adores her 8 year old gelding. For me, she reflects
what horse trainers and owners should be. People may say because Cirrus Des
Aigles is not an entire racehorse, he is less likely to be admired by the
public, as he cannot run in certain races (for example the Prix De L’Arc De
Triomphe). This however is a totally separate issue, yet fans of horse racing
alone, for now, are 100% behind the veteran. I’m sure you will join me in
wishing both him and California Chrome successful recoveries.
No comments:
Post a Comment